[...]
Dissecting Anti-Porn

Do the specific accusations hurled at pornography stand up under examination? (…)

PORNOGRAPHY IS VIOLENCE BECAUSE WOMEN WHO POSE FOR PORN ARE SO TRAUMATIZED BY PATRIARCHY THEY CANNOT GIVE REAL CONSENT.

Although women in pornography appear to be willing, anti-porn feminists know that no psychologically healthy woman would agree to the degradation of pornography. Therefore, if agreement seems to be present, it is because the women have "fallen in love with their own oppression" and must be rescued from themselves. A common characteristic of the porn actresses I have interviewed is a love of exhibitionism. Yet if such a woman declares her enjoyment in flaunting her body, anti-porn feminists claim she is not merely a unique human being who reacts from a different background or personality. She is psychologically damaged and no longer responsible for her actions. In essence, this is a denial of a woman's right to choose anything outside the narrow corridor of choices offered by political/sexual correctness. The right to choose hinges on the right to make a "wrong" choice, just as freedom of religion entails the right to be an atheist. After all, no one will prevent a woman from doing what he thinks she should do.

[...]

McElroy, Wendy. A Feminist Defense of Pornography,
Free Inquiry magazine, Volume 17, Number 4. – retrieved from http://www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/mcelroy_17_4.html on June 2012